CRAN Package Check Results for Package meteR

Last updated on 2025-05-12 06:50:22 CEST.

Flavor Version Tinstall Tcheck Ttotal Status Flags
r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang 1.2 3.07 67.93 71.00 NOTE
r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc 1.2 2.76 46.22 48.98 NOTE
r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang 1.2 119.50 OK
r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-gcc 1.2 193.17 OK
r-devel-windows-x86_64 1.2 4.00 94.00 98.00 ERROR
r-patched-linux-x86_64 1.2 3.83 64.59 68.42 OK
r-release-linux-x86_64 1.2 3.18 63.57 66.75 OK
r-release-macos-arm64 1.2 70.00 OK
r-release-macos-x86_64 1.2 103.00 OK
r-release-windows-x86_64 1.2 5.00 92.00 97.00 OK
r-oldrel-macos-arm64 1.2 54.00 OK
r-oldrel-macos-x86_64 1.2 83.00 OK
r-oldrel-windows-x86_64 1.2 4.00 115.00 119.00 OK

Check Details

Version: 1.2
Check: CRAN incoming feasibility
Result: NOTE Maintainer: ‘Cory Merow <cory.merow@gmail.com>’ No Authors@R field in DESCRIPTION. Please add one, modifying Authors@R: c(person(given = "Andy", family = "Rominger", role = "aut"), person(given = "Cory", family = "Merow", role = c("aut", "cre"), email = "cory.merow@gmail.com")) as necessary. Found the following \keyword or \concept entries which likely give several index terms: File ‘ebar.Rd’: \keyword{METE,} \keyword{MaxEnt,} \keyword{multiplier,} File ‘ipd.Rd’: \keyword{METE,} \keyword{MaxEnt,} \keyword{multiplier,} File ‘meteESF.Rd’: \keyword{METE,} \keyword{MaxEnt,} \keyword{multiplier,} File ‘meteSSF.Rd’: \keyword{METE,} \keyword{multiplier,} File ‘predictESF.Rd’: \keyword{METE,} \keyword{MaxEnt,} \keyword{multiplier,} File ‘print.meteESF.Rd’: \keyword{METE,} \keyword{MaxEnt,} \keyword{multiplier,} File ‘sad.Rd’: \keyword{METE,} \keyword{MaxEnt,} \keyword{multiplier,} File ‘spd.Rd’: \keyword{METE,} \keyword{MaxEnt,} \keyword{multiplier,} Flavors: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc

Version: 1.2
Check: tests
Result: ERROR Running 'testthat.R' [20s] Running the tests in 'tests/testthat.R' failed. Complete output: > library(testthat) > library(meteR) > > test_check("meteR") 1 0.00146 0.00146 [1] TRUE 2 0.000162 0.000162 [1] TRUE 3 0.000155 0.000155 [1] TRUE 4 0.00464 0.00464 [1] TRUE 5 0.007085 0.007085 [1] TRUE 6 0.00511 0.00511 [1] TRUE 7 0.00261 0.00261 [1] TRUE 8 0.00279 0.00279 [1] TRUE 9 0.021 0.021 [1] TRUE 10 0.00823 0.00823 [1] TRUE 11 0.0168 0.0168 [1] TRUE 12 0.0135 0.0135 [1] TRUE 13 0.0228 0.0228 [1] TRUE 14 0.000174 0.000174 [1] TRUE 15 0.000254 0.000254 [1] TRUE 16 0.00042 0.00042 [1] TRUE 17 0.000244 0.000244 [1] TRUE 18 0.000488 0.000488 [1] TRUE 19 0.000342 0.000341 [1] TRUE 20 0.00168 0.00168 [1] TRUE 21 5.9e-05 5.92e-05 [1] TRUE 22 4.3e-05 4.27e-05 [1] TRUE 23 0.000117 0.000117 [1] TRUE 24 0.061 0.061 [1] TRUE 25 0.003175 0.003175 [1] TRUE 26 0.003872 0.003872 [1] TRUE 27 0.134 0.134 [1] TRUE 28 0.0189 0.0189 [1] TRUE 29 0.00109 0.00109 [1] TRUE simulating data that conform to state variables: attempt 1 [ FAIL 1 | WARN 0 | SKIP 0 | PASS 43 ] ══ Failed tests ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ ── Failure ('test_zScore.R:11:3'): z score for logLik is approx chi-squared ──── ... < 0.05 is not TRUE `actual`: FALSE `expected`: TRUE [ FAIL 1 | WARN 0 | SKIP 0 | PASS 43 ] Error: Test failures Execution halted Flavor: r-devel-windows-x86_64